The Watchtower’s commentary on Isaiah states:
Therefore, Isaiah’s condemnation of Judah applies today to Christendom. A study of her history—her wars, her crusades, her Inquisitions—reveals just how sour her fruit has been! Nevertheless, the true vineyard of anointed Christians and their “great crowd” companions must heed Isaiah’s words. If they are to please the vineyard’s owner, they must, individually and as a group, produce fruits that please him.
Although not stated explicitly, according to the Watchtower’s inchoate commentary Jehovah apparently has two vineyards: One that produces fine fruit and another that produces sour grapes, which supposedly pictures Christendom. But that is not what is conveyed in the prophecy at all. There is only one vineyard that God declares to be his own. What is more, the Watchtower claims that those who survived the modern-day burning down of the one vineyard were the relative handful of International Bible Students associated with the Watchtower during the First World War. Obviously, though, there is nothing in the recent history of God’s people that compares with the burning down of Jerusalem.
But as regards the Watchtower Society’s commentary quoted above, God does not solely indict his nation for bloodshed, as the Watchtower implies by their citing Christendom’s bloody history. God also condemns his people for their unrighteous attitudes and practices, as will be considered. Even at that, though, the leadership of the Watchtower Society well knows that bloodguilt may be incurred by means other than the outright spilling of blood in warfare. For example, in order to motivate Jehovah’s Witnesses to preach, the Watchtower teaches that any negligent minister may incur bloodguilt. And what about stumbling others? Surely that would incur bloodguilt too. And in that respect, the Watchtower Society has incurred bloodguilt in a way that is not possible for Christendom. How many millions of Jehovah’s Witnesses and those on the periphery of the organization have been stumbled by the countless stumbling blocks too numerous to recount here, which the Society has left strewn in the path of life since its inception?
Jehovah has good reason to rinse away even the bloodshed of the modern-day Jerusalem with the spirit of judgment and of burning down!
Now consider God’s denunciation as expressed in the fifth chapter of Isaiah. “For the vineyard of Jehovah of armies is the house of Israel, and the men of Judah are the plantation of which he was fond. And he kept hoping for judgment, but, look! the breaking of law; for righteousness, but, look! an outcry.”
Back in the 1st chapter of Isaiah Jehovah warmly invites his people to let him set them straight. In the verse preceding that invite God gave this exhortation: “Learn to do good; search for justice; set right the oppressor; render judgment for the fatherless boy; plead the cause of the widow.”
If then, according to the context of Isaiah, it will become necessary for God to set matters straight in “the final part of the days,” so as to make their scarlet and crimson-colored sins as white as snow and wool, it must be that his people have missed the mark when it comes to their obligation of setting right the oppressor and rendering judgment for the fatherless boy and pleading the cause of the widow. These are the judgments that God kept hoping would exist within his organizational vineyard; but instead, upon his inspection, he finds the breaking of law and an outright outcry!
Now consider: The Watchtower Society claims that God set matters straight with them back in 1918 and the Society’s “prophets” have cleverly redirected all other negative aspects of Jehovah’s judgments against “Israel” to Christendom. They have led Jehovah’s Witnesses to believe that God rinsed away the excrement of their Babylonish ways a long time ago. But in the years since then, particularly in recent decades, it has become apparent that no such cleansing has taken place. How so?
What about the thousands of pedophiles among Jehovah’s Witnesses and their thousands of victims? Could Jehovah possibly pardon the leadership of an organization that has calculatingly shielded pedophiles from exposure under the guise of protecting Jehovah’s name from being reproached; thereby leaving children vulnerable to the cunning of known child predators?
So what if Jehovah’s Witnesses have rejected pagan doctrines like eternal torment, the immortal soul, and the trinity? That does not exempt one from practicing the weightier things of the law, such as the aforementioned obligations to set right the oppressor and render judgment for the fatherless boy and widow, does it?
It does not matter if leading men among Jehovah’s Witnesses have declared the organization to be righteous in the sight of God. It is Jehovah’s judgment that counts. And Jehovah is inclined to listen to the outcry of the lowly, the meek, the brokenhearted, the disaffected and oppressed – rather than to the corporation’s spokesmen and prominent men who wield authority over them.
Not only that but to their shame, in actual court briefs the Watchtower’s lawyers have claimed that Christian elders bear no fiduciary responsibility to protect children in their respective congregations from the crimes of a fellow congregant. Obviously, Jehovah has another perspective on that.
For these and other reasons, God is now determined to set fire to his vineyard.